WIMB £100 RUNNER UP PRIZE WINNER RHIANNON HEAVEN

 A Woman’s Role is in the Revolution by Rhiannon Heaven 

As a teenager, I was captivated by Constance Markievicz. She seemed to leap from  the pages of the history books with her rousing appeal to “leave your jewels and gold wands in the bank and buy a revolver;”1disrupting both the male-centric picture of the Easter Rising  and my impressions of what women could achieve in the early twentieth-century. 

In 1915, Markievicz wrote a column in which she looked back to the women of the  1798 rebellion to find “the heroic greatness of these our foremothers which may be a light in  the path of us women of to-day.”2 While she noted that much of what was available  amounted only to drifting “allusions”3to the actions of women, she found material to fill her  column and I felt a great sense of affinity with her in, nearly a century later, repeating the act  of looking for inspiration in the women of the past. 

But researching Markievicz also introduced a very different revolutionary figure; her  sister, Eva Gore-Booth. In much of what I read, she merited only a brief mention in a list of  Markievicz’s siblings. I would quickly skim these details to get to the interesting parts where  Markievicz trained Na Fianna Éireann and took up arms against an empire.  

Sonja Tiernan has noted that Gore-Booth is often relegated to a footnote in the life of  her sister,4and that was what she remained to me until I found a copy of the Prison Letters of  Constance Markievicz.5 These letters brought Markievicz to life but also ignited a new  curiosity in the ‘Dearest Old Darling’ to whom she wrote.  

My early attempts to find out more about Gore-Booth were marred with a frustrating  lack of details, but I was lucky that my interest in her began just prior to the publication of her biography by Tiernan, whose extensive research filled many of these gaps.6 

Discovering more about Gore-Booth provoked both enthrallment and a sense of  horror at how easily I had dismissed her as less interesting. Though she abhorred the  militarism embraced by her sister, she was no less of a revolutionary. Her revolution was  staged, not at St. Stephen’s Green, but in her writing, her committed activism, and her  unrelenting questioning of the norms of her society.  

The litany of her remarkable achievements makes her relative obscurity in Irish and  British history bewildering. She was prominent in the suffrage movement and fought  paternalistic legislation that disadvantaged women while claiming to protect them from ‘dangerous’ and ‘immoral’ jobs.7 Surely her 1907 campaign, which took on and defeated  none other than Winston Churchill in defense of Manchester barmaids, should alone have  cemented her place in the annals of the women’s movement. 

Risking imprisonment, she promoted pacifism during the First World War and drew  attention to the government’s brutal treatment of conscientious objectors.8 Despite her rejection of violence, she supported the cause of Irish nationalism and was  involved in post-Rising efforts to support imprisoned rebels and bereft families.9 As part of the radical Aëthnic Union and its journal Urania, she not only challenged gender roles and stereotypes but rejected the duality of the gender binary itself;10 a rejection often framed in contemporary discourse as being an unprecedented, 21st century idea.  

1 Constance Markievicz, “The Future of Irishwomen: Speech delivered by Countess Markievicz at I.W.F.L. Meeting, October 12th,” Irish Citizen, October 23, 1915, https://www.irishnewsarchive.com/ina_wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Irish-Citizen Publictions.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1JI4vQNJHXrA4PDEBDowpy6bB3rLk9Vi0575yvdus1OE_-M00cJ_ysKXw. 2 Constance Markievicz, “Women of Ninety-Eight: II,” Irish Citizen 4 (26), November 13, 1915, 161, 

https://digitalcollections.tcd.ie/concern/parent/2v23vt37b/works/k643b283q

3 3 Constance Markievicz, “Women of Ninety-Eight,” Irish Citizen 4 (25), November 6, 1915, 150, 

https://digitalcollections.tcd.ie/concern/parent/2v23vt37b/works/k643b283q

4 Sonja Tiernan, “Challenging Presumptions of Heterosexuality: Eva Gore-Booth, A Biographical Case Study,” Historical  Reflections/Reflexions Historiques 37, no. 2 (January 1, 2011), https://doi.org/10.3167/hrrh.2011.370205

5 Esther Roper (ed.), Prison Letters Of Countess Markievicz (Constance Gore-Booth) (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1934). 6 Sonja Tiernan, Eva Gore-Booth: An Image of Such Politics (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2012). 7 Tiernan, Image of Such Politics. 

8 Tiernan, Image of Such Politics. 

9 Tiernan, Image of Such Politics. 

10 Tiernan, Image of Such Politics.

The journal also presented same-sex female relationships as an ideal and Tiernan  argues that this is a key factor in Gore-Booth’s erasure from history. 

Her earliest biographer, Gifford Lewis, went to great lengths to deny any evidence of what she termed “perverted sexuality.”11 However, in reading Gore-Booth’s sapphic poetry  and of her devotion to Esther Roper it is not difficult to conclude that Lewis either did not  look very hard or, more likely, was profoundly unobjective in her research. 

If women’s position in history is obscured, women who are further marginalized by  factors such as race or sexuality are only increasing erased. Tiernan argues that Eva has been  excluded from history, despite the great prominence and recognition that she gained in her  time, not only due to misogyny, but in large part because of homophobia.  

It can be easy to assume that the narrative of history that we have is the only one available. But even that which we consider certain and unshakable can be challenged and  reformed, while what was once buried or erased can be resurrected. Eva Gore-Booth’s poem An Epitaph visualizes this: 

'Alas that every flower is dead!'  

These words a smiling angel read 

Carven on an ancient stone,  

By wild roses overgrown.12 

In the years since I first searched for Eva Gore-Booth, besides Tiernan's biography,  she has been remembered in a speech by President Higgins,13 been discussed on Panti Bliss’s  Pantisocracy podcast,14 and her poem "The Body to the Soul" set to music by Loah.15 

Like the wild roses of her poem, Eva’s life and works have re-flourished and begun to  reoccupy spaces from which she was excluded by virtue of her gender and sexuality. The  work of historians, like Tiernan, in recovering supposedly ‘forgotten’ revolutionary women is  a revolution in itself, which challenges and transforms the familiar narratives of history. 

Dale Spender lamented that, in each generation, women should have to “reinvent the  wheel” and begin from scratch to recover the buried stories of women’s history.16 However,  there seems to be a growing feeling that a history that centers only straight, white men will no  longer be accepted.  

I am hopeful that, at last, the recovered narratives of revolutionary women like Eva  Gore-Booth will not be reburied but instead become so firmly rooted as to overgrow the  accepted histories of every political and social revolution until it becomes both impossible  and unthinkable to separate ‘women’s history’ from ‘history.’ 

When future generations of women look back to their own foremothers, they should  have no need to scour the archives to reconstruct 'forgotten' stories or to be content with  'allusions' as Markievicz was. Rather, they should easily see that a woman's role is whatever  she wants it to be: a writer, a politician, an activist, and, undoubtedly, a revolutionary. 

11 Quoted in Tiernan, “Challenging Presumptions of Heterosexuality,” 60. 

12 Eva Gore-Booth, Poems (London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1898). 

13 Michael D. Higgins, “The importance of Eva Gore-Booth’s Radical Vision in the Dramatic Historical Events of the late 19th and early  20th centuries,” transcript of speech delivered at Congress Hall, London, UK, October 14, 2016, https://president.ie/en/media library/speeches/speech-by-president-michael-d.-higgins-on-eva-gore-booth. 

14 Panti Bliss, host, “Season 2 Episode 2: Women in the Making,” Pantisocracy (podcast), 2017, http://pantisocracy.ie/se2e2/. 15 Loah, “The Body to the Soul,” April 29, 2021, https://loah.bandcamp.com/track/the-body-to-the-soul. 

16 Dale Spender, Women of Ideas and What Men Have Done to Them (London: Pandora, 1988): 13.

Bibliography 

Gore-Booth, Eva. Poems. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1898. 

Tiernan, Sonja. “Challenging Presumptions of Heterosexuality: Eva Gore-Booth, A Biographical  Case Study.” Historical Reflections/Reflexions Historiques 37, no. 2 (January 1, 2011).  https://doi.org/10.3167/hrrh.2011.370205

Tiernan, Sonja. Eva Gore-Booth: An Image of Such Politics. Manchester: Manchester University  Press, 2012. 

Roper, Esther (Editor). Prison Letters Of Countess Markievicz (Constance Gore-Booth). London:  Longmans, Green and Co., 1934. 

Spender, Dale. Women of Ideas and What Men Have Done to Them. London: Pandora, 1988.

#WIMB

Women in Media Belfast. Amplifying women’s voices. Showcasing expertise.

https://wimbelfast.com
Previous
Previous

WIMB £100 RUNNER UP PRIZE WINNER RACHEL NEWELL

Next
Next

WIMB £100 RUNNER UP PRIZE WINNER LOUISE TAYLOR